Author Topic: Did California glock owners get poked in the rear?  (Read 31 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ranger99

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9653
I get messages from people all the time.
Some I don't know at all and I erase and
don't view.
Some I sort of know and I'll look over and
most likely just erase.

I got one earlier while I was out doing jungle
control ( mowing) and it struck me as odd
even though I didn't reply.
From what I'm understanding, the California
state legislature has approved a bill that will
ban Glock semi automatic handguns from
citizens possession because of all this
"switch " bs.  Just waiting on the cal gubernur's
signature.

Is that accurate at all, or is it hype bs ?
I'm not apathetic like the typical 2025
citizen. I know that many times when
Kalifornia does some silliness, it opens
the door for other pinheads to follow suit.

Anybody know exactly and precisely what
they're doing on the west coast?
I know it's nothing helpful to legitimate
gun owners there. The state gubmint
could care less about the law abiding
taxpayers there
18 MINUTES.  . . . . . .

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27142
  • Gender: Male
Re: Did California glock owners get poked in the rear?
« Reply #1 on: Today at 09:04:43 AM »
GOA hasn't sent me anything on it.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Online Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24541
  • Gender: Male
Re: Did California glock owners get poked in the rear?
« Reply #2 on: Today at 11:15:58 AM »
Assymbly Bill 1127 bans any handgun easily modified to full auto. Waiting on Gavy.
Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. Weak men create hard times.

Online Bob Riebe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7939
Re: Did California glock owners get poked in the rear?
« Reply #3 on: Today at 11:40:03 AM »

     No, the bill does not ban all Glock handguns, but Assembly Bill 1127 bans the sale of new "machine gun-convertible pistols" in California and is intended to prevent illegal conversion of Glock and Glock-style handguns into fully automatic weapons using illegal "Glock switches".
The bill targets pistols with a specific internal design that allows them to be easily outfitted with these switches. If signed into law, the ban on new sales would take effect after July 1, 2026, and would not affect current Glock owners.

What the Bill Does:

    Targets machine gun-convertible pistols:

AB 1127 prohibits licensed dealers from selling semi-automatic handguns that are defined as "machine gun-convertible" due to a specific internal component, the cruciform trigger bar, which enables the use of a "Glock switch".
Does not name "Glock" specifically:

The bill uses a functional definition that includes Glock pistols and their clones but doesn't mention the brand by name.
Exempts law enforcement:
The bill includes exemptions for law enforcement and military personnel.

Penalties for dealers:
Dealers caught selling these "machine gun-convertible pistols" face fines and potential loss of their license


      A 1911 can be converted to full auto if a person has the time and desire. These switches are technically illegal already.
      I am surprised, because a Glock can so easily be converted, that is has not been put into an NFA category; the Spitfire semi-auto rifle had that happen because it was so easy to convert to full auto.